• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Baldani Law Group

Lexington & Central Kentucky Criminal Defense Attorneys

SCHEDULE A CONSULTATION

Call us 24/7 at
(859) 259-0727

  • Home
  • About Our Firm
    • Attorneys
      • Russ Baldani
      • Brandi Lewis
      • Tucker Richardson
      • Mike Rowland
      • Rachel Yavelak
      • Daniel Crall
    • Areas We Serve
      • Carlisle
      • Danville
      • Frankfort
      • Georgetown
      • Harrodsburg
      • Lawrenceburg
      • Lexington
      • Morehead
      • Mt. Vernon
      • Nicholasville
      • Paris
      • Richmond
      • Versailles
      • Williamstown
      • Winchester
    • Baldani Law Group Scholarship
  • Practice Areas
    • Criminal Defense
      • Appeals
      • Arson
      • Assault
      • Burglary
      • Criminal Trespass
      • Disorderly Conduct
      • Domestic Violence
        • Protective Order Violations
      • DUI
      • Drug Offenses
        • Marijuana Crimes
      • Expungements
      • Flagrant Non Support
      • Kidnapping
      • Misdemeanor
      • Probation Revocation
      • Professional License Defense
      • Sex Offenses
        • Possession of Child Pornography
      • Student Conduct & Discipline Hearings
        • Title IX Defense
      • Theft
        • Robbery
        • Shoplifting
        • Theft By Deception
      • Traffic Law
        • Reckless Driving
      • Federal Crimes
      • Murder
        • Manslaughter
          • Reckless Homicide
      • White Collar Crimes
    • Family Law
    • Personal Injury
  • Case Results
  • Reviews
  • Blog
  • Resources
    • Divorce FAQs
    • Fayette County Substance Abuse Resources
    • Kentucky Gun Law Guide
    • Automated Void & Seal Tool For Kentucky Possession of Marijuana Charges
    • Suppression Series
    • Understanding Kentucky Bond and Pretrial Release
    • UK Students Guide to Drinking, Drugs and the Police
  • Contact Us
Call
Contact
Blog
  • Home
  • About Our Firm
    • Attorneys
      • Russ Baldani
      • Brandi Lewis
      • Tucker Richardson
      • Mike Rowland
      • Rachel Yavelak
      • Daniel Crall
    • Areas We Serve
      • Carlisle
      • Danville
      • Frankfort
      • Georgetown
      • Harrodsburg
      • Lawrenceburg
      • Lexington
      • Morehead
      • Mt. Vernon
      • Nicholasville
      • Paris
      • Richmond
      • Versailles
      • Williamstown
      • Winchester
    • Baldani Law Group Scholarship
  • Practice Areas
    • Criminal Defense
      • Appeals
      • Arson
      • Assault
      • Burglary
      • Criminal Trespass
      • Disorderly Conduct
      • Domestic Violence
        • Protective Order Violations
      • DUI
      • Drug Offenses
        • Marijuana Crimes
      • Expungements
      • Flagrant Non Support
      • Kidnapping
      • Misdemeanor
      • Probation Revocation
      • Professional License Defense
      • Sex Offenses
        • Possession of Child Pornography
      • Student Conduct & Discipline Hearings
        • Title IX Defense
      • Theft
        • Robbery
        • Shoplifting
        • Theft By Deception
      • Traffic Law
        • Reckless Driving
      • Federal Crimes
      • Murder
        • Manslaughter
          • Reckless Homicide
      • White Collar Crimes
    • Family Law
    • Personal Injury
  • Case Results
  • Reviews
  • Blog
  • Resources
    • Divorce FAQs
    • Fayette County Substance Abuse Resources
    • Kentucky Gun Law Guide
    • Automated Void & Seal Tool For Kentucky Possession of Marijuana Charges
    • Suppression Series
    • Understanding Kentucky Bond and Pretrial Release
    • UK Students Guide to Drinking, Drugs and the Police
  • Contact Us

Sentencing, By The Numbers


A relatively recent trend in sentencing is using data-driven risk assessment tools to determine who is “high risk” to reoffend and who is not, and to use that information in guiding sentencing: if someone is determined to be “low risk,” the likelihood of them receiving a lenient sentence from the judge would be greater than someone who is determined to be “high risk” — at least, that’s how the thinking goes.

The way risk level is determined is by examining characteristics of the individual in question, and comparing those characteristics with a broad statistical base of other people who have been arrested for crimes. For example, one characteristic many of these tools look at is drug abuse. If someone has abused drugs in the recent past, they might be assessed a higher risk level than someone who has not because drug abuse is associated with an increased risk of the commission of a new crime.

It is an issue that is currently coming to the fore as the federal government is pondering the place of these empirical tools in federal sentencing (it is already used in Kentucky for state convictions as part of the Pre-Sentence Report). Recently, Attorney General Eric Holder has come out against the practice of data-driven sentencing, citing concerns about exacerbating racial disparities in the criminal justice system.

The problem is inherent in how many of these tools calculate risk, and in the factors that they use. One such factor is race. Simply put, if the person in question is a minority, they receive an elevated bump in their risk assessment seeing as how being a minority is associated with reoffense.

Setting aside the question of fairness, political correctness, or wisdom of using static characteristics, the real issue here is just whether this is reflective of reality. Data, for example, supports the conclusion that whites and blacks use marijuana at roughly the same rates, yet blacks are arrested at a rate two to three times higher than whites. Scott Greenfield at his blog Simple Justice sums up the point thusly:

More young black men are recidivists because more black men are arrested, even though there is evidence that they don’t commit more crimes than white men. They just get arrested more, because they are who the police spend their time arresting. This gives rise to an internal community spiral, missing fathers (because they’re in prison), poor education, poor job prospects, etc.  Toss in a criminal conviction and ask empiricism why they aren’t being hired for well-paying jobs at IBM.

The numbers, in other words, are only as good as the process that produces them. If the process is flawed (i.e., if the criminal justice system is biased towards locking up minorities and letting white offenders skate on similar charges), then the numbers themselves are skewed as well and in the end it simply doesn’t matter how accurate the data-driven empiricism is. The correlation between race and re-offending might be strong, but the question that should loom large is whether that correlation is less reflective of reality and more reflective of our system’s built-in biases towards incarcerating minorities. Because if data-driven sentencing really takes hold, it re-frames our collective biases under the auspices of science.

Filed Under: News

Primary Sidebar

SCHEDULE A CONSULTATION

  • Please complete the form below. We’ll get back to you soon.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.









Most Viewed

  • Can Convicted Felons Own A Gun In Kentucky?
  • Tips for an Effective Character Letter for a Judge
  • What Is the Age of Consent in Kentucky?
  • Do You Have to Identify Yourself to Kentucky Police?

Recent Posts

  • Best of Lexington
  • National news media contacts those in the know: Baldani weighs in on Scottie Scheffler facing charges
  • Whitney Rowe, Outstanding Young Lawyer
  • The Men to See
  • The Jennifer Crumbley Verdict – a Warning Sign for Parents

Client Testimonials

I Couldn’t Ask For A Better Lawyer

Tucker is good at what he does and it shows. I couldn’t ask for a better lawyer. He treated me more like a friend than just another client. Money well spent. I would recommend him to anyone in search of a criminal defense lawyer. I asked around who was the best lawyer in town, I was told Baldani Law Group…

READ MORE

Did Not Give Up

Tucker Richardson worked really hard for me and did not give up during the arraignment for my second Alcohol Intoxication charge to prove there was no probable cause for my arrest. His effort and persistence ultimately led to the judge not wanting to send my case to trial and the charge of AI against me was dismissed…

READ MORE

HIGHLY Recommend

Too bad you can only give five stars!! Frankly, I’ve had to use the services of Tucker and Brandi more often than I want, but what a super job they did. They are professional, but they don’t lose that personal connection. I would HIGHLY recommend them to anyone, anytime. Love you guys!!!!

READ MORE

Amazing

Brandi Lewis is amazing!!! Great communication, clear expectations, efficient and effective. We honestly could not ask for more from her!!! This entire team is a very reputable office that should be used with any legal needs. Thanks for everything!!!

READ MORE

THIS IS THE FIRM YOU MUST CHOOSE!

If you are here reading reviews in hopes of finding a law firm that can help you and get you the best results possible, THIS IS THE FIRM YOU MUST CHOOSE! We hired Tucker a couple months back, the state was trying to void my probation an my future at freedom was at great risk.

READ MORE

I would highly recommend Whitney Rowe!

I would highly recommend Whitney Rowe! She was very easy to work with, communicated very clearly and had a sense of calm that was relieving as a client. She was up front with all the possible outcomes of the case and didn’t leave me with any false hope.

READ MORE

VIEW ALL TESTIMONIALS

Footer

BALDANI LAW GROUP
300 W Short Street, Lexington, KY 40507

(859) 259-0727 (Phone)

(859) 787-0259 (Fax)

Monday-Friday 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.

PROVEN RESULTS

Established in 1988, the Baldani Law Group has successfully represented thousands of individuals across the Commonwealth of Kentucky. With over 100 years of combined experience, let our team of attorneys fight for your rights.

Copyright © 2025 Baldani Law Group | Lexington Criminal Defense Lawyers | All Rights Reserved | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Anti-spam